All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Ronny Hegewald <Ronny.Hegewald@online.de>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: allow sata_sil24 to opt-out of tag ordered submission
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:24:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BD139E.7080204@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150119141249.GA8140@htj.dyndns.org>

Hello.

On 1/19/2015 5:12 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:

>>>   	for (i = 0, tag = ap->last_tag + 1; i < max_queue; i++, tag++) {
>>> -		tag = tag < max_queue ? tag : 0;
>>> +		if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_LOWTAG)
>>> +			tag = i;
>>> +		else
>>> +			tag = tag < max_queue ? tag : 0;

>>     Ugh, this is clear abuse of the ?: operator... Why not simply:

>> 		else if (tag >= max_queue)
>> 			tag = 0;

> Why is that a clear abuse?  Seems like a pretty typical use to me.

    This is my first reaction to statements like 'x = x < M ? x : 0'. I really
prefer two-liners with *if* to them.

> Thanks.

MBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-19 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-16 23:12 [PATCH 0/2] fix sil24 regression and muddy the ata tag allocation waters Dan Williams
2015-01-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] libata: allow sata_sil24 to opt-out of tag ordered submission Dan Williams
2015-01-17 10:59   ` Sergei Shtylyov
     [not found]     ` <CAPcyv4h3n+cnvADiEbGgi1EFCqEwhzZ7gt_6XUmSC62aOf2Dzw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-17 18:43       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-01-19 14:12     ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-19 14:24       ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2015-01-19 14:27         ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-19 14:13   ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] libata: micro-optimize tag allocation Dan Williams
2015-01-16 23:17   ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-16 23:19     ` Dan Williams
2015-01-16 23:21     ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-16 23:38       ` Dan Williams
2015-01-16 23:31   ` Shaohua Li
2015-01-16 23:49     ` Dan Williams
2015-01-16 23:55       ` Shaohua Li
2015-01-16 23:59         ` Dan Williams
2015-01-17  0:10           ` Shaohua Li
2015-01-19 14:14   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54BD139E.7080204@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=Ronny.Hegewald@online.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.