From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com (Masami Hiramatsu) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:17:40 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v19 00/11] ARM: kprobes: OPTPROBES and other improvements. In-Reply-To: <1420638014.4044.52.camel@linaro.org> References: <1420457284-76923-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <1420638014.4044.52.camel@linaro.org> Message-ID: <54BDBAC4.5040003@hitachi.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org (2015/01/07 22:40), Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > I think that the patches up to 09/11 inclusive have been though more > that enough review and revisions to think about getting them merged, > there doesn't seem much point in continuously resending them whilst new > features are built on top of them. > > Masami Hiramatsu, are you happy for your patch to generic+X86 kprobes > code [1] to go through the ARM maintainers tree, assuming Russell is > also happy with that. Or should that go via a different route? Yes, I'm OK to go it through the ARM maintainers tree :) Thank you, > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313218.html > > Wang Nan, assuming everyone is happy, can you put together a branch in a > git repository for those patches, or I'm more than happy to do that if > you like. Then I can give the series a final test and we can send a pull > request to Russell King. > > Thanks all > -- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752448AbbATCRs (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:17:48 -0500 Received: from mail7.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.42]:49793 "EHLO mail7.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752356AbbATCRr (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:17:47 -0500 Message-ID: <54BDBAC4.5040003@hitachi.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:17:40 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu Organization: Hitachi, Ltd., Japan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" Cc: Wang Nan , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, lizefan@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v19 00/11] ARM: kprobes: OPTPROBES and other improvements. References: <1420457284-76923-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <1420638014.4044.52.camel@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1420638014.4044.52.camel@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2015/01/07 22:40), Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > I think that the patches up to 09/11 inclusive have been though more > that enough review and revisions to think about getting them merged, > there doesn't seem much point in continuously resending them whilst new > features are built on top of them. > > Masami Hiramatsu, are you happy for your patch to generic+X86 kprobes > code [1] to go through the ARM maintainers tree, assuming Russell is > also happy with that. Or should that go via a different route? Yes, I'm OK to go it through the ARM maintainers tree :) Thank you, > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313218.html > > Wang Nan, assuming everyone is happy, can you put together a branch in a > git repository for those patches, or I'm more than happy to do that if > you like. Then I can give the series a final test and we can send a pull > request to Russell King. > > Thanks all > -- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com