Re: [Documentation][PATCH] release-notes: grammar edits to introduction

[Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com>]

On 01/16/2015 07:42 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Daiane Angolini <daiane.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com>
>>> -The BSP upstreaming cycle starts just after a |freescale_release_name|
>>> +The BSP upstream cycle starts just after a |freescale_release_name|
>>
>> Here I need Otavio's help.
>>
>> Otavio, I remember we have already discussed regarding the difference
>> of "upstreaming" and "upstream" but now I don't remember exactly what
>> =P
>>
>> I would say Bob's suggestion is ok, what do you think?
>
> As not being a native I mean have a wrong understand here. However I
> think we need to keep clear in the text that there is a flow of
> changes which _never_ ends, starting with the release.
>
> Bob, as a native, do you have a better idea?
>

I just submitted a V2 patch.  The title for the upstream section is now 
'upstreaming' in my attempt to concisely describe the act of submitting 
upstream patches.  However, I think the term 'upstream cycle' is also 
correct since 'upstream' describes the 'cycle', and cycle conveys that 
process never ends.

I hope I also addressed Daiane's other concerns adequately.

Thanks

Bob