From: Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/module.c: Free lock-classes if parse_args failed
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:47:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BE082A.20207@ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iog2arfk.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
20.01.2015 9:37, Rusty Russell пишет:
> Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru> writes:
>> parse_args call module parameters' .set handlers, which may use locks defined in the module.
>> So, these classes should be freed in case parse_args returns error(e.g. due to incorrect parameter passed).
> Thanks, this seems right. Applied.
>
> But this makes me ask: where is lockdep_free_key_range() called on the
> module init code? It doesn't seem to be at all...
As I understand, locks are not allowed to be defined in the module init
section. So, no needs to call lockdep_free_key_range() for it.
This has a sense: objects from that section are allowed to be used only
by module->init() function. But a single function call doesn't require
any synchronization wrt itself.
If it helps, I used module below for verify effect of the patch:
test.c:
---
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
MODULE_AUTHOR("Tsyvarev Andrey");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex_main);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex_param);
static int param_set(const char* val, const struct kernel_param* kp)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex_param); //Use mutex defined in the module
mutex_unlock(&mutex_param);
return -EINVAL; // Setting this parameter is always invalid
}
static struct kernel_param_ops param_ops =
{
.set = param_set
};
module_param_cb(param, ¶m_ops, NULL, S_IRUGO);
static int minit(void)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex_main); // Use another mutex
mutex_unlock(&mutex_main);
return 0;
}
static void mexit(void)
{
}
module_init(minit);
module_exit(mexit);
--
insmod test.ko param=1 # Will fail
insmod test.ko
If kernel is compiled with CONFIG_LOCKDEP, then, without patch, lockdep
crashes on the second module insertion.
>
> Confused,
> Rusty.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru>
>> ---
>> kernel/module.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
>> index 3965511..2b44de4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/module.c
>> +++ b/kernel/module.c
>> @@ -3311,6 +3311,9 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
>> module_bug_cleanup(mod);
>> mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
>>
>> + /* Free lock-classes: */
>> + lockdep_free_key_range(mod->module_core, mod->core_size);
>> +
>> /* we can't deallocate the module until we clear memory protection */
>> unset_module_init_ro_nx(mod);
>> unset_module_core_ro_nx(mod);
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
--
Best regards,
Andrey Tsyvarev
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web:http://linuxtesting.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 6:25 [PATCH] kernel/module.c: Free lock-classes if parse_args failed Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-20 6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-20 7:47 ` Andrey Tsyvarev [this message]
2015-01-21 1:40 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-21 10:49 ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-22 0:40 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-22 9:27 ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-20 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 0:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-19 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 12:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BE082A.20207@ispras.ru \
--to=tsyvarev@ispras.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.