From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v10 07/19] mfd: max77693: Adjust FLASH_EN_SHIFT and TORCH_EN_SHIFT macros Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:11:52 +0100 Message-ID: <54BE6228.5070304@samsung.com> References: <1420816989-1808-1-git-send-email-j.anaszewski@samsung.com> <1420816989-1808-8-git-send-email-j.anaszewski@samsung.com> <20150120111719.GF13701@x1> <54BE51B2.8040209@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <54BE51B2.8040209@samsung.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, pavel@ucw.cz, cooloney@gmail.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, sakari.ailus@iki.fi, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, Chanwoo Choi List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On 01/20/2015 02:01 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 01/20/2015 12:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Jan 2015, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> >>> Modify FLASH_EN_SHIFT and TORCH_EN_SHIFT macros to work properly >>> when passed enum max77693_fled values (0 for FLED1 and 1 for FLED2) >>> from leds-max77693 driver. >> >> Off-by-one ay? Wasn't the original code tested? > > The driver using these macros is a part of LED / flash API integration > patch series, which still undergoes modifications and it hasn't > reached its final state yet, as there are many things to discuss. To be more precise: the original code had been tested and was working properly with the header that is in the mainline. Nonetheless, because of the modifications in the driver that was requested during code review, it turned out that it would be more convenient to redefine the macros. I'd opt for just agreeing about the mfd related patches and merge them no sooner than the leds-max77693 driver is merged. -- Best Regards, Jacek Anaszewski