From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YDgjz-0000H0-5w for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:53:39 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (unknown [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C619B40CFC7 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:53:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54BECE4D.9020308@candelatech.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:53:17 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: More than one ath10k NIC in 3.19.0-rc5? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k I tried running a patched version of 3.19.0-rc5 kernel, and it seems to work fine when there is one ath10k NIC in the system, but when there is two it doesn't try to load the firmware. Hacked 3.17.8+ works fine. Anyone tried more than one ath10k NIC in 3.19 kernel? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k