From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <picmaster@mail.bg>
Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118)
	id 87C9BE00873; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:38:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	yocto-www.yoctoproject.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at
	http://www.dnswl.org/, no *      trust
	*      [193.201.172.117 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	* 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
	provider *      (picmaster[at]mail.bg)
	* -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	*      [score: 0.0000]
	* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's *       domain
	*  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
	*      valid
	* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
Received: from mx1.mail.bg (mx1.mail.bg [193.201.172.117])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D736E00860
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:38:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.123] (unknown [93.152.132.24])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 919EC6000A68;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:38:48 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default;
	t=1421800728; bh=gxWFtrUKtSJRcBltuh7yGswU8P2Vto/oQax2CNDu+ec=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:
	In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=Y7ZQu2eU4x6llPR+yat2dFHlKoxU7jKeT2mHKjf1n57IJ7NPWdnZHY5ZfLRT1+OKo
	MgGRkrfRz9CLrqJe6O654eVKsXy/sGyTjvcAhvJeFb3DtWZSbcx0Lv8sQe+JTY7re7
	TMFGItt0sW2N8q1QB3xeeuTp2/QpPRMRfEd9E4Es=
Message-ID: <54BEF511.8040703@mail.bg>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:38:41 +0200
From: Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
References: <54BED2E8.70901@mail.bg>
	<CAOMZO5BaBzn1x93RP5L_Qbk5kmx8hpT5WJ_m3UcnEyLiu5M6PQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<54BEF411.9080503@mail.bg>
In-Reply-To: <54BEF411.9080503@mail.bg>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: Audio glitch with SGTL5000
X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers
	<meta-freescale.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale>
List-Post: <mailto:meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:38:53 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Fabio,

One more thing - just checked one of the latest mainline kernels 
(3.17.7) and understood why your patch worked - the SMALL_POP definition 
is really broken there, as you suggested. But on the 3.10.17-1.0.0ga 
version the definition was OK.

Kind regards,
Nikolay