Re: [Qemu-devel] Can we make better use of Coverity?

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 21/01/2015 14:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Defect density by component, from
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/378?tab=overview

Updated:

bt		4610	1.74	8
slirp		6968	1.44	10
9pfs		9493	1.37	13
user		32263	0.68	22
fpu		15355	0.59	9
(headers)	12323	0.57	7
mips		34321	0.52	18
net		27732	0.43	12
util		12668	0.39	5
lm32		2836	0.35	1
block		62844	0.35	22
ui		43828	0.34	15
ppc		49651	0.28	14
char		10703	0.28	3
disas		38362	0.26	10
i386		36786	0.22	8
migration	5249	0.19	1
usb		25647	0.19	5
m68k		5533	0.18	1
s390		17171	0.17	3
sparc		14788	0.14	2
tricore		7801	0.13	1
pci		11623	0.09	1
Other		297281	0.08	25
scsi		14521	0.07	1
audio		16304	0.06	1
arm		75435	0.03	2
Defect-free	93835	0.00	0
--------------------------------------------
Total		985931	0.22	220

Other is now smaller by 15%.  It will get even smaller as soon as the
list is refreshed: I've just created qemu-ga and xen components, as well
as moved more files out of Other (and into lm32, ppc and tcg).

Defect-free includes: alpha, cris, microblaze, openrisc, sh, unicore32,
xtensa, libcacard, monitor, nbd, tcg (though it will get a defect as
soon as the list is refreshed), trace.

There are a good number of subsystems that are really close to 0.

Paolo