All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:30:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BFE22C.1090701@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_M=WE7WBv_HH+JhCdOt-63cLGhjcmt0sr2J4vVWVnSFqw@mail.gmail.com>

Hey,

On 21-01-15 17:16, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> wrote:
>> Op 21-01-15 om 11:35 schreef Jammy Zhou:
>>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcuy,
>>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
>>>
>>> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0'
>>> to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout.
>>>
>>> v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0
>>>
>>> v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>>
>> Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
> 
> Dave, Maarten,
> 
> Do you want to pick these up, or would you rather I pulled them through my tree?
This goes through Sumit Semwal's tree. He's the dma-buf maintainer and I already made him aware of the patches.

~Maarten
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-21 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-21 10:35 [PATCH 1/2] reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3) Jammy Zhou
2015-01-21 10:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-01-21 16:16   ` Alex Deucher
2015-01-21 17:30     ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2015-01-21 17:34       ` Alex Deucher
2015-01-22 10:00         ` Sumit Semwal
2015-01-21 10:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/fence: don't wait when specified timeout is zero Jammy Zhou
2015-01-21 10:31   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-01-21 11:09   ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54BFE22C.1090701@canonical.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.