From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srinivas Eeda Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:12:06 -0800 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: should not use le32_add_cpu to set ocfs2_dinode i_flags In-Reply-To: <54C04D64.80501@huawei.com> References: <54BFE80E.7090002@oracle.com> <54C04D64.80501@huawei.com> Message-ID: <54C04E66.4090506@oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Ok, understood. Thanks for explaining :) On 01/21/2015 05:07 PM, Joseph Qi wrote: > Hi Srini, > > On 2015/1/22 1:55, Srinivas Eeda wrote: >> Hi Joesph, >> >> thanks a lot for submitting the above patch. I am trying to understand what kind of flag corruption have you noticed and under what circumstances ? I agree with the patch that bitwise operations are better than adding, but I am not able to understand the corruption it could cause. Can you please share! >> > Suppose a the following case: > The dinode i_flag already has the OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL bit set, and calling > le32_add_cpu again. Then it will corrupt the i_flag. > > -- > Joseph > >> Thanks, >> --Srini >> >> >> >