Re: [PULL] drm-amdkfd-next

[Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com>]

On 01/22/2015 01:47 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 21 January 2015 at 22:38, Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Another pull request for 3.20.
>>
>> drm-amdkfd-next-2015-01-21:
>>
>> - Infrastructure work in amdkfd to prepare for VI support. This work mainly
>>    includes separating modules into ASIC-specific functionality, adding
>>    new properties that are relevant for VI, making sure that shared code is
>>    reused, etc.
>>
>> - Improve mechanism of submitting packets to HIQ (the kernel queue that amdkfd
>>    uses to issue commands to the GPU). The driver used to verify that each CS
>>    was read by the GPU. However, this proved to be both unnecessary and erroneous.
>>    Therefore, we cancelled this verification.
>>
>> - Moved initialization of compute VMIDs into radeon driver
>>
>> - Various minor fixes
>
>
>   CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager_cik.o
> /home/airlied/devel/kernel/drm-next/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c:
> In function ‘destroy_queue_nocpsch’:
> /home/airlied/devel/kernel/drm-next/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c:291:9:
> warning: ‘mqd’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>    retval = mqd->destroy_mqd(mqd, q->mqd,
>           ^
>
> Looks valid to me, I've pulled this but please follow up ASAP with a
> fix for the new warning.
>
> Dave.
>
Thanks, sent the fix (and others) to the mailing list.

	Oded
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel