From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
rgb@redhat.com, sd@queasysnail.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:58:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C12C4A.5080108@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3252765.lrITUkIS9l@sifl>
On 01/22/2015 08:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 09:36:34 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 01/21/2015 08:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> This patchset has some important changes from the previous revision,
>>> namely a fix from Al Viro (included in 2/5) that resolves a boot panic
>>> on some systems as well as some smaller, less noteworthy fixes found
>>> in the linux-next announcement thread from January 20th (refcount bump
>>> in __audit_reusename() and a inode type in __audit_inode()).
>>>
>>> This patchset still needs some additional testing to verify that the
>>> audit code still functions properly (the minor fixes mentioned above)
>>> and there is an additional patch from Al that should be included as
>>> well, but I wanted to post this and push the series to the audit next
>>> branch quickly since a number of folks were affected by the boot panic.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Paul Moore (5):
>>> fs: rework getname_kernel to handle up to PATH_MAX sized filenames
>>> fs: create proper filename objects using getname_kernel()
>>> audit: enable filename recording via getname_kernel()
>>> audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and
>>> __audit_inode_child()
>>> audit: replace getname()/putname() hacks with reference counters
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> What is the baseline for this patch set ? Obviously -next won't work,
>> and it does not apply to mainline either.
>
> This patchset currently lives, along with one other unrelated patch, in the
> audit next branch:
>
> * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/audit
>
> I'm currently testing these in combination with the patch Al posted last
> night. Assuming all goes well I'll drop them from the audit next branch and
> toss all six patches (these plus Al's) into another branch in case Al wants to
> pull them for the VFS tree.
>
The version in the audit next tree works with my qemu microblaze test,
so feel free to add
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 4:59 [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling Paul Moore
2015-01-22 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] fs: rework getname_kernel to handle up to PATH_MAX sized filenames Paul Moore
2015-01-22 15:53 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-22 16:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-01-22 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] fs: create proper filename objects using getname_kernel() Paul Moore
2015-01-22 15:54 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-22 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] audit: enable filename recording via getname_kernel() Paul Moore
2015-01-22 5:00 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and __audit_inode_child() Paul Moore
2015-01-22 16:04 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-22 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] audit: replace getname()/putname() hacks with reference counters Paul Moore
2015-01-22 16:09 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-22 16:24 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 5:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling Guenter Roeck
2015-01-22 7:54 ` Al Viro
2015-01-22 16:23 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 21:25 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 21:29 ` Al Viro
2015-01-22 21:40 ` Al Viro
2015-01-22 22:05 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-23 5:30 ` Al Viro
2015-01-23 16:15 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-24 9:03 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-01-24 22:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-26 15:52 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 17:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-01-22 16:22 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-22 16:58 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C12C4A.5080108@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.