From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Cc: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: sparse: new feature " multiple initializers" has false positives on MODULE_ALIAS
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:31:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C15E0E.4000008@de.ibm.com> (raw)
Linus, Christopher,
Commit 0f25c6a78e08fdc15af5e599d836fa24349c042f ("Add warning about duplicate initializers") has a false positive on arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
CHECK arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:1823:1: error: symbol '__UNIQUE_ID_alias__COUNTER__' has multiple initializers (originally initialized at arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:1822)
1822: MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(KVM_MINOR);
1823: MODULE_ALIAS("devname:kvm");
Preprocessing with gcc gives
static const char __UNIQUE_ID_alias0[] __attribute__((__used__)) __attribute__((section(".modinfo"), unused, aligned(1))) = "alias" "=" "char-major-" "10" "-" "232";
static const char __UNIQUE_ID_alias1[] __attribute__((__used__)) __attribute__((section(".modinfo"), unused, aligned(1))) = "alias" "=" "devname:kvm";
so alias0 and alias1 instead of __COUNTER__.
I never heard of __COUNTER__ before, so I guess its some gcc magic that sparse should mimic..
Christian
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 20:31 Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2015-01-23 16:40 ` sparse: new feature " multiple initializers" has false positives on MODULE_ALIAS Christopher Li
2015-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH] Teach sparse about the __COUNTER__ predefined macro Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-01-23 22:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2015-01-23 22:38 ` josh
2015-01-23 23:59 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-01-24 1:29 ` Josh Triplett
2015-01-24 11:27 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-01-24 20:19 ` Josh Triplett
2015-01-24 20:39 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-01-25 20:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-28 10:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-02 5:17 ` Christopher Li
2015-02-04 2:38 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-02-12 20:16 ` Christopher Li
2015-02-04 2:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] test-suite: add support for tests case involving several input files Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-02-06 15:02 ` Christopher Li
2015-02-04 2:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] test-suite: allow filename expansion of the input sections Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-02-04 2:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] test-suite: consolidate tests that require include files into single test files Luc Van Oostenryck
2015-02-04 3:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] test-suite: allow filename expansion of the input sections Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C15E0E.4000008@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.