From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDA672718 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0N0sc6T006785 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:54:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.174] (128.224.162.174) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:54:37 -0800 Message-ID: <54C19BCC.7080102@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:54:36 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1421158296.31262.17.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <54BCBBF6.4020904@windriver.com> <1421663325.1798.31.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <54BDBC83.9030007@windriver.com> <54C0BE76.7030601@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: bitbake-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitbake: Add pyinotify to lib/ X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:54:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/22/2015 08:50 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 22 January 2015 at 09:10, Robert Yang > wrote: > > I run 5 builds on the same host, each of them is BB_NUMBER_THREADS=32 and > PARALLEL_MAKE="-j32", I can get the error every time when "bitbake image". > Then I use "ulimit -u 10000", the "bitbake image" works well, and the > world is in building. > > > I'd suggest option (3), reducing the amount of parallelism. If you're expecting > five builds on the machine, then reducing those values would reduce wasted > parallelism - after all you've got over 3000 tasks sleeping. But I've never seen this error before 2015/01/02, do you know anything about what changes cause this issue recently, please ? // Robert > > Ross