All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dewangga Bachrul Alam <dewanggaba@xtremenitro.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Change sector size on existing partition
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:35:41 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C25C3D.9070205@xtremenitro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150123140611.GB2864@laptop.bfoster>

Hi,

On 01/23/2015 09:06 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:46:59PM +0700, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The device reported like this :
>>
>> $ blockdev --getss --getpbsz --getiomin --getioopt /dev/dm-3
>> 512
>> 4096
>> 4096
>> 0
>>
> 
> What is dm-3? Is that a logical volume based on a volume group on top of
> your physical array? It might be good to get the equivalent data for the
> array device (md?) and at least one of the physical devices (sd?).
> 

dm-3 is logical partition, not my physical array. Here is my partition
table :

--
NAME                                   MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda                                      8:0    0  1.8T  0 disk
├─sda1                                   8:1    0  500M  0 part /boot
└─sda2                                   8:2    0  1.8T  0 part
  ├─vg_catalystdb01-lv_root (dm-0)     253:0    0   50G  0 lvm  /
  ├─vg_catalystdb01-lv_swap (dm-1)     253:1    0 31.5G  0 lvm  [SWAP]
  ├─vg_catalystdb01-lv_home (dm-2)     253:2    0 48.8G  0 lvm  /home
  ├─vg_catalystdb01-lv_database (dm-3) 253:3    0 97.7G  0 lvm
/var/lib/mysql
  ├─vg_catalystdb01-lv_tmp (dm-4)      253:4    0  3.9G  0 lvm  /tmp
  ├─vg_catalystdb01-lv_var (dm-5)      253:5    0 19.5G  0 lvm  /var
  ├─vg_catalystdb01-lv_audit (dm-6)    253:6    0  3.9G  0 lvm
/var/log/audit
  └─vg_catalystdb01-lv_log (dm-7)      253:7    0  7.8G  0 lvm  /var/log
--

XFS file system is only mounted on vg_catalystdb01-lv_database (dm-3).

>> Then, the sector size should be 512. Don't know why it can be 4096. :( I
>> will try to backup them and reformat. Any suggestion for formating on
>> raid-10 array? The device is 4 x 1TB drives.
>>
> 
> According to the above you have 4k physical sectors and 512b logical
> sectors. IIUC, this means mkfs will use the physical size by default,
> but you can specify and the device can handle down to 512 sectors.
> 
> From skimming through the link posted earlier, it sounds like you have
> an application that has a hardcoded dependency on 512b direct I/O
> requirements (e.g., buffer alignment) rather than being configurable..?
> Can you disable direct I/O and verify whether that works? Regardless, it
> might be wise to test out this 512b sector configuration (perhaps with a
> single or spare drive?) and verify this fixes the problem you're trying
> to solve before reconfiguring everything.
> 

If I disable directio, the application works well.

Then, I've reformat the existing partition, and enable directio
parameter. It's works. It's the new result.

$ xfs_info /dev/dm-3
meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg_catalystdb01-lv_database isize=256
agcount=16, agsize=1600000 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=0
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=25600000, imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=12500, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0


Thanks bro.

> Brian
> 
>> On 01/23/2015 08:39 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:04:44PM +0700, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm new to XFS, I have RAID-10 array with 4 disk, when I check with
>>>> xfs_info, the information print like this.
>>>>
>>>> $ xfs_info /var/lib/mysql
>>>> meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg_catalystdb01-lv_database isize=256
>>>> agcount=16, agsize=1600000 blks
>>>>          =                       sectsz=4096  attr=2, projid32bit=0
>>>> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=25600000, imaxpct=25
>>>>          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
>>>> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
>>>> log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=12500, version=2
>>>>          =                       sectsz=4096  sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
>>>> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to change `sectsz` value to 512 without re-format it? Or
>>>> any suggestion? I have issue with current sector size, my TokuDB
>>>> engines[1] can't start because of this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The only way to set things like sector size, block size, etc. is to
>>> reformat. I believe the default sector size is dependent on the physical
>>> device. You might want to report the following from your array device
>>> and perhaps from some or all of the member devices:
>>>
>>> blockdev --getss --getpbsz --getiomin --getioopt <device>
>>>
>>> Brian
>>>
>>>> [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tokudb-user/kvQFJLCmKwo
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> xfs mailing list
>>>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-23 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-23 13:04 Change sector size on existing partition Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 13:39 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-23 13:46   ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 14:06     ` Brian Foster
2015-01-23 14:35       ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam [this message]
2015-01-23 15:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-01-23 15:40   ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 15:49     ` Eric Sandeen
2015-01-23 16:26       ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 16:44         ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54C25C3D.9070205@xtremenitro.org \
    --to=dewanggaba@xtremenitro.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.