From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <54C64E1D.2070302@grinta.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:24:29 +0100
From: Daniele Nicolodi <daniele@grinta.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <129277905.Ag2XebZWbK@soho> <2052908.cWhQn5Pgch@soho>
 <54C64338.8050904@grinta.net> <1698729.oQQF6krV5a@soho>
In-Reply-To: <1698729.oQQF6krV5a@soho>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Packaging Xenomai-3
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org

On 26/01/15 15:17, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> I'm not talking about user configuration. AFAIK the idea is that you can 
> compile and link your code (without any change) again the library built to 
> work cobalt or mercury. No that the user config it in runtime.

I don't see the problem in simply using a different install path for the
two libraries then. As Gilles repeated a few times now, this is
perfectly supported by the status quo.

Cheers,
Daniele