From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <54C6BF08.3020606@grinta.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:26:16 +0100 From: Daniele Nicolodi MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <129277905.Ag2XebZWbK@soho> <2155048.C7RTQC2ILE@indiana> <20150126182046.GL12812@hermes.click-hack.org> <2312262.WiWDxI5CGn@indiana> In-Reply-To: <2312262.WiWDxI5CGn@indiana> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Packaging Xenomai-3 List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org On 26/01/15 23:17, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > AFAIK, looking the sources of the package, the names of the libraries are > different. And installing in my box I have: > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcurl-nss.so.4.3.0 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcurl-gnutls.so.4.3.0 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcurl.so.4.3.0 > > that comes from libcurl3-nss, libcurl3-gnutls and libcurl3. The last one > (OpenSSL flavour) The different library names are created in the debian package, not by the upstream build system: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/curl.git/tree/debian/rules That is what Gilles wanted to point out: renaming the packaged library is done by the packaging machinery to suite the distribution, not upstream. > I agree. I would like to find something that could benefit all the parts. If you > prefer not rename, no problem. I though that it could be a good idea for all. > Also I have to say that I don't think that it has sense to implement it in > packaging. This kind of modifications have to have a very good reason to > diverge from upstream. See above. Cheers, Daniele