From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>, artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Sheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Current linux-next status of UBI/UBIFS? Re: new UBI co-maintainer
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:47:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C90484.4050001@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C84CC2.6060708@huawei.com>
Hi!
Am 28.01.2015 um 03:43 schrieb hujianyang:
> On 2015/1/22 17:26, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to give Richard Weinberger UBI tree push rights, so that he
>> could help us improving the QoS.
>>
>> If no one objects, lets make it effective.
>>
>
> Hi Artem,
>
> First, thank Richard for his contributions to UBI/UBIFS.
>
>
> I regret to say the updating of UBI/UBIFS was blocked about 2 months.
> So Richard could help us maintaining the improvement of UBIFS next?
>
> I've sent some patches to MTD list these days, what's the opinion of
> you and Richard about these pacthes?
>
> [PATCH] UBI: add ubi_err() to report the failure of leb read
IIRC I had some questions on that patch. If all questions are resolved I'm fine with it.
> [PATCH RFC 1/2] UBIFS: fix empty log leb error
These patches look okay to me but as they are posted as RFC I really want
a comment from Artem on them.
> [PATCH] UBI: fix soft lockup in ubi_check_volume()
I'm also fine with that.
> and ubidump v6
For ubidump I have to read the whole thread again as I got lost in it. :)
> The patch "UBI: fix soft lockup in ubi_check_volume()" solves a really
> important problem, I wish it could be merged into stable soon.
Yes.
> I've discussed with Richard about the recovery of an corrupted UBIFS
> image, for example, ECC error. And actually my colleagues and I had
> worked out some features to improve the reliability of UBIFS. We are
> happy to share our design and greatly aspire the help from community.
Nice.
> Also, I think we could start to add more functions to my ubidump to
> make it a useful tool.
I have to look at ubidump in detail but it sounds good.
To debug fastmap issues I have also a tool to analyze UBI images.
Maybe we can merge. First I have to shape it up.
> I think the updating of UBI/UBIFS will re-start soon, am I right?
Correct. Currently I'm preparing the tree.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 9:26 new UBI co-maintainer Artem Bityutskiy
2015-01-22 21:57 ` Brian Norris
2015-01-28 2:43 ` Current linux-next status of UBI/UBIFS? " hujianyang
2015-01-28 15:47 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2015-01-29 3:28 ` hujianyang
2015-01-29 9:08 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C90484.4050001@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=hujianyang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=shengyong1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.