Re: [PATCH] CXL: Fix device_node reference counting

[Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 01/28/2015 12:53 AM, Ian Munsie wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-01-28 16:04:40 +1100:
>>> I just wanted to check the status of this one? I can't see it in your
>>> tree and wanted to make sure you didn't simply miss it.
>>
>> It looked fishy, but I never got around to replying.
>>
>> The second sentence in the explanation should never be true:
>
> Right, that was the point of the fix ;)
>
>> You shouldn't have np unless you did an of_node_get() to get it, otherwise it's
>> pointing at something you don't have a reference for and it might go away at
>> any time.
>>
>> So the patch may fix the bug but I don't think it's correct.
>>
>> I think pnv_pci_to_phb_node() should be doing a get for you, before returning
>> the pointer.
>
> Agreed - we should probably also rename it to have 'get' in the name,
> like pnv_pci_get_phb_node().

Yeah, that's way better than the current patch.

>
>> See as a comparison pcibios_get_phb_of_node().
>
> We could almost use that instead, except it's not exported for modules
> and I'm not sure if that even works with __weak functions?
>
>
> Ryan - do you want to respin this, or would you rather I take it?

Sure, I'll respin and resend as a bug fix.

-Ryan

>
> Cheers,
> -Ian
>