From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YGqaL-0004fU-NX for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:00:46 +0000 Message-ID: <54CA4B06.10807@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 07:00:22 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k:Prevent setting wrong key idx for station References: <1422369059-21274-1-git-send-email-senthilb@qti.qualcomm.com> <54C7C3B7.4020706@candelatech.com> <87fvat3ml0.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <87fvat3ml0.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: senthilb@qti.qualcomm.com, SenthilKumar Jegadeesan , ath10k@lists.infradead.org I didn't realize it was only about WEP...probably not worth bothering stable for just that. Thanks, Ben On 01/29/2015 02:31 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ben Greear writes: > >> On 01/27/2015 06:30 AM, senthilb@qti.qualcomm.com wrote: >>> From: SenthilKumar Jegadeesan >>> >>> Ath10k driver sets wrong default key idx that results in >>> sending unicast frames with multicast key. >> >> Is this something that should be back-ported to stable releases? > > Sure, if somebody cares about WEP that much :) > > Should I add CC stable to the patch? > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k