From: Pengyu Ma <pengyu.ma@windriver.com>
To: Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [V2][PATCH] mesa: Upgrade to 10.4.0
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:56:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CB3932.2090308@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP71Wjxk0XFr5L6YL55GBUeGkx0q+dyh1fw245qi7O7j7gJE9w@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/30/2015 03:51 PM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Pengyu Ma <pengyu.ma@windriver.com> wrote:
>> mesa_git bb will keep sync the latest version 10.4.3, that's why we keep
>> both _git and 10.4.0.
>> Now all all the version of xorg-video-intel, libdrm, and xserver-xorg are
>> the same with Intel Graphic stack 2014 Q4.
>> So mesa_10.4.0 will make a stable and verified solution here,
>> and _git version will make the latest version here.
>>
> i think you missed the point. you cannot justify the need for 10.4.0
> because it is the 'prefered' Intel version. the policy is that we
> provide in OE-core the most recent stable releases of upstream
> components. when/if I need a specific version of mesa (or anything
> else) for my project, i have a recipe in my own project layer, but
> OE-core is agnostic to that.
>
> now, if a specific version of mesa is known to be broken, upstream, or
> in very special circumstances, we might want to not use it... but that
> isn't the case here, especially since both Ross and I are asking you
> to upgrade to 10.4.3..
>
> if you don't submit 10.4.3, someone else will anyways. and actually i
> have submitted a libdrm upgrade yesterday which is likely to be merged
> soon..
Understood, but there are 2 version mesa_xxx.bb and mesa_git.bb.
Is there any reason why keep two versions?
If I updated mesa_xxx.bb to 10.4.3, it will be the same as mesa_git.bb.
Regards,
Pengyu
>
> cheers
> nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-30 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 8:57 [V2][PATCH] mesa: Upgrade to 10.4.0 Pengyu Ma
2015-01-29 9:53 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2015-01-29 10:05 ` Pengyu Ma
2015-01-29 10:10 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2015-01-29 10:35 ` Burton, Ross
2015-01-30 1:51 ` Pengyu Ma
2015-01-30 7:51 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2015-01-30 7:56 ` Pengyu Ma [this message]
2015-01-30 8:02 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2015-01-30 9:05 ` Richard Purdie
2015-01-30 9:12 ` Pengyu Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54CB3932.2090308@windriver.com \
--to=pengyu.ma@windriver.com \
--cc=nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.