Re: rgw backports to giant update

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2721 bytes --]

Hi Yehuda,

Thanks a lot for this inventory. I updated the tickets to make sure all of them have the "giant" string in the backport field. I'll try backporting myself which will help when it's trivial. If I hit a conflict I'll get back to you :-)

Greetings from Brussels !

On 30/01/2015 20:05, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> these are the actual issues that I backported:
> 
>  - 9878  rhel7 s3-tests fail due to missing reason
>  - 9918  RGW-Swift: SubUser access permissions, does not seems to workminor
>  - 10103 swift tests failing
>  - 10354 Failed s3 tests in
> upgrade:dumpling-firefly-x:parallel-next-distro-basic-multi run
>  - 10471 rgw: metadata sync doesn't create subusers correctly
>  - 9254  rgw: civetweb requires explicit \r\n for http headers
>  - 9478  Incorrect content type in response header
>  - 9479  ETag is not included in the XML response to put object copy
> operationminor
>  - 9877  In some cases it's possible for rgw to segfault on http COPY
>  - 10329 rgw: s3 need to return SignatureDoesNotMatch instead of
> AccessDenied- minor
>  - 5595  object has a Content-Type, but its content_type property is
> not shown in Swift object enumeration
>  - 9907  Normal    radosgw-admin: can't disable max_size quota
>  - 9973  Validation of Swift DLO manifest object ETag doesn't match
> OpenStack Swift behavior
>  - 10307 rgw: setting bucket attributes (swift POST on bucket)
> sometimes failminor
>  - 10334 rgw: s3 need to return InvalidAccessKeyId instead of AccessDenied
>  - 9587  ceph-radosgw sysvinit script on EL6 cannot set ulimit
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> Unless I'm mistaken there currently are no rgw issues scheduled to be backported to giant (i.e. with the giant word in the backport field of the issue)[1] that have already been backported to firefly, as part of the v0.80.8[2] release or after[3]. You mentionned that about 18 patches backported to firefly should also be backported to giant and I was hoping to find which one exactly thanks to the backport field.
>>
>> I'll go thru the rgw backports found in v0.80.8 to figure out which one should be in giant. I don't need anything righ now, this is just an update to let you know things are making progress.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> [1] inventory of the pending giant v0.87.1 release http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501
>> [2] inventory of the firefly v0.80.8 commits http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10639
>> [3] inventory of the pending firefly v0.80.9 release http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10641
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>>

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]