diff for duplicates of <54CDFF1D.8090507@kernel.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index c0d782c..7a53abb 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On 12/01/15 01:57, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > using sensor_hub_register_callback function. The usage id parameter of the > capture_sample can be matched with the usage id of the requested attribute. > -> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> +> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Looks like a straightforward 'pattern' to me. Only real question is whether reversing the logic in the read function to make the synchronous case the one that has the if statement would lead to a cleaner result? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index c008c5f..9e2558a 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,16 +1,15 @@ "ref\01421027826-25785-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com\0" "ref\01421027826-25785-2-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com\0" - "ref\01421027826-25785-2-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v1] HID: hid-sensor-hub: Extend API for async reads\0" "Date\0Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:25:33 +0000\0" - "To\0Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>" - jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org - " a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org\0" - "Cc\0linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" - linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - holler-SXC+2es9fhnfWeYVQQPykw@public.gmane.org - " rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>" + jkosina@suse.cz + " a.zummo@towertech.it\0" + "Cc\0linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" + linux-input@vger.kernel.org + holler@ahsoftware.de + " rtc-linux@googlegroups.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 12/01/15 01:57, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:\n" @@ -19,7 +18,7 @@ "> using sensor_hub_register_callback function. The usage id parameter of the\n" "> capture_sample can be matched with the usage id of the requested attribute.\n" "> \n" - "> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>\n" "Looks like a straightforward 'pattern' to me. Only real question is whether\n" "reversing the logic in the read function to make the synchronous case the\n" "one that has the if statement would lead to a cleaner result?\n" @@ -232,4 +231,4 @@ "> * @hsdev:\tHub device instance.\n" > -4aabb7dbb26bd2be86bd8de1df29331789877ad482f225f61a7d0e26482eb730 +e3076dd3791dfd3c53b08ac9b3cc1f78ba91c868859ebd06796b006b9c10871d
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.