From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39049) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyxp-0004d3-6y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:09:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHyxo-0003lc-BT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 13:09:41 -0500 Message-ID: <54CE6BD8.6000305@ilande.co.uk> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 18:09:28 +0000 From: Mark Cave-Ayland MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1421704772-10394-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> In-Reply-To: <1421704772-10394-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] timer/m48t59: QOM'ify List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIFBvdXNzaW5lYXU=?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org On 19/01/15 21:59, Hervé Poussineau wrote: > Hi, > > This patchset QOM'ifies the m48t59 timer. > Patch 1 allows the creation of the m4859 ISA device from the command line. > Patch 2 QOM'ifies the device. > Patches 3 add a Nvram interface to m48txx devices, so that callers can > detect the device and use it without knowing m48txx internals. > Patch 4 is using this new Nvram interface and cleaning the m48t59 header. > > Patches 3 and 4 are not needed for m48t59 QOM'ification, but are in my > opinion a nice cleanup. > > Hervé Poussineau (4): > m48t59: move ISA ports/memory regions registration to QOM constructor > m48t59: register a QOM type for each nvram type we support > m48t59: add a Nvram interface > m48t59: let init functions return a Nvram object > > hw/ppc/ppc.c | 161 ---------------------- > hw/ppc/prep.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 8 +- > hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 10 +- > hw/timer/m48t59.c | 336 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > include/hw/timer/m48t59.h | 60 ++++---- > 6 files changed, 429 insertions(+), 307 deletions(-) I've tested this in conjunction with a rebased version of my sun4u NVRAM changes for SPARC32 and SPARC64 and it looks good so: Tested-by: Mark Cave-Ayland I'll post a new version of my sun4u NVRAM changes rebased on your two patchsets shortly. ATB, Mark.