Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation

["Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>]

On 2015/1/27 13:35, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> On 2015/1/24 2:09, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 01/23/15 16:29, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Arend van Spriel<arend@broadcom.com>  writes:
>>>
>>>> On 01/22/15 14:54, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/22/2015 4:49 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From 04d3fa673897ca4ccbea6c76836d0092dba2484a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>>> From: Zhonghui Fu<zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:14:13 +0800
>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation
>>>>>>> WiFi chip has 2 SDIO functions, and PM core will trigger
>>>>>>> twice suspend/resume operations for one WiFi chip to do
>>>>>>> the same things. This patch avoid this case.
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel<arend@broadcom.com>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov<sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Kalle Valo<kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu<zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>> I don't remember giving Acked-by to this (or for matter to anything for
>>>>>> a long time). What about Sergei or Arend?
>>>>> I haven't ACK'ed this patch either.
>>>> I did ACK the initial patch and felt it still valid for this 'V2' patch.
>>> Ok, thanks. So the patch is good, Zhonghui just needs to remove the two
>>> acked-by lines.
>> Indeed.
> I have removed the two acked-by lines and sent the new patch in another mail.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhonghui
What comments about the new patch?  Can this new patch be accepted?


Thanks,
Zhonghui
>> Regards,
>> Arend
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html