From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] usb: extcon: Fix USB-Host cable name Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:04:21 +0900 Message-ID: <54CF0555.4080004@samsung.com> References: <1422274532-9488-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1422274532-9488-3-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <54CB6539.1040703@ti.com> <54CB8FBD.6050701@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <54CB8FBD.6050701@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Roger Quadros Cc: balbi@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, george.cherian@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi Roger, On 01/30/2015 11:05 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > Hi, > > On 30/01/15 13:04, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Felipe & Chanwoo, >> >> On 26/01/15 14:15, Roger Quadros wrote: >>> The recommended name for USB-Host cable state is "USB-Host" and not >>> "USB-HOST" as per drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c extcon_cable_name. >>> >>> Change all instances of "USB-HOST" to "USB-Host". >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros >>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi >>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi >> >> This patch has no dependency to the rest so can be picked up as soon as possible. >> >> Do you think it is better to go via the USB tree? >> If yes then Chanwoo, can you please Ack this one? Thanks. >> >> This would mean that only the first patch needs to go through extcon tree as Tony >> will pick the rest. > > Hold on. Let's first decide what we really want to go ahead with > "USB-Host" or "USB-HOST". Currently, extcon driver have used the specific cable name(USB-Host or USB-HOST) without any standard way. So, I have plan to define common cable name in extcon header file by using capital letter. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi