All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes/x86: Use the current code when modified by Kprobes using ftrace
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:40:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CF37EA.50000@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422632700-4342-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz>

(2015/01/31 0:45), Petr Mladek wrote:
> can_probe() checks if the given address points to the beginning of
> an instruction. It analyzes all the instructions from the beginning
> of the function until the given address. The code might be modified
> by another Kprobe. In this case, the current code is read into a buffer,
> int3 breakpoint is replaced by the saved opcode in the buffer, and
> can_probe() analyzes the buffer instead.
> 
> There is a bug that __recover_probed_insn() tries to restore
> the original code even for Kprobes using the ftrace framework.
> But in this case, the opcode is not stored. See the difference
> between arch_prepare_kprobe() and arch_prepare_kprobe_ftrace().
> The opcode is stored by arch_copy_kprobe() only from
> arch_prepare_kprobe().

Good catch!

> This patch makes Kprobe to use the current code when it is modified
> by ftrace. It is not the original one but it is a valid instruction
> of the same length. Therefore it is perfectly fine for the check.

Hmm, but there is a chance we can hit it in the period of replacing code.
This means we'll see 5byte nop but started with int3. (see P6_NOP5 in
arch/x86/include/asm/nops.h)
So, I think we'd better return a special buffer which has a 5byte NOP.

Thank you for reporting!

> 
> Note that I found this problem when playing with Kprobes. I did it
> on x86_64 with gcc-4.8.3 that supported -mfentry. I modified
> samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c and added offset 5 to put
> the probe right after the fentry area:
> 
> --- cut ---
>  static struct kprobe kp = {
>  	.symbol_name	= "do_fork",
> +	.offset = 5,
>  };
> --- cut ---
> 
> Then I was able to load kprobe_example before jprobe_example
> but not the other way around:
> 
> $> modprobe jprobe_example
> $> modprobe kprobe_example
> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'kprobe_example': Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character
> 
> It did not make much sense and debugging pointed to the bug
> described above.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> index 98f654d466e5..ef321caae3ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> @@ -225,8 +225,14 @@ __recover_probed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
>  	struct kprobe *kp;
>  
>  	kp = get_kprobe((void *)addr);
> -	/* There is no probe, return original address */
> -	if (!kp)
> +	/*
> +	 * Use the current code if it is not modified by Kprobe
> +	 * or when the Kprobe is using ftrace. In the second case
> +	 * we do not have any information about the original code
> +	 * but it is not a problem. Ftrace has put there a valid
> +	 * instruction of the same length.
> +	 */
> +	if (!kp || kprobe_ftrace(kp))
>  		return addr;
>  
>  	/*
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com



  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-02  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-30 15:45 [PATCH] kprobes/x86: Use the current code when modified by Kprobes using ftrace Petr Mladek
2015-02-02  8:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2015-02-02 14:57   ` Petr Mladek
2015-02-02 17:04     ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54CF37EA.50000@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.