From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 9C950E0086F; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 07:44:24 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6C4E00809 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 07:44:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 13436F811DB; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:44:17 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9105AF811D7; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:44:14 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54CF9B4E.9030401@mlbassoc.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:44:14 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <7B6FE55CD594D7478CED8A39DF3BFC0A5E74429D@UT40SVCWEM001.atk.com> <54CF9646.8030103@mlbassoc.com> <7B6FE55CD594D7478CED8A39DF3BFC0A5E7442CE@UT40SVCWEM001.atk.com> <54CF9877.8070607@mlbassoc.com> <1422891226.22544.4.camel@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1422891226.22544.4.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: COMPATIBLE_HOST X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:44:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2015-02-02 08:33, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 08:32 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: >> On 2015-02-02 08:28, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote: >>> Gary, >>> >>> It seems like COMPATIBLE_MACHINE would have values such as >> genericx86, qemux86-64, or beaglebone. If that's true, I don't think I >> want to use COMPATIBLE_MACHINE as my recipes are only dependent on the >> architecture. >> >> You can also use architecture here - basically anything that is an override can be used. >> Similar to Ross' answer, I think this should work: >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = '(i.86|x86_64)' > > No, that syntax is for COMPATIBLE_HOST... So how would one write this. We use similar syntax to specify architecture dependencies in some ARM recipes, e.g. COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "ls102xa" where ls102xa is an architecture (SOC) override and this allows the recipe only for LS102x targets. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------