From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 447BDE008A6; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:41:25 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.46 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D775E00824 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id lj1so84293216pab.5 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:41:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MQWrPt9xNphhdIy5rOZsYF2gIoXWQrwk1iK0AFRkF7U=; b=Av7SnDFKD7/BI8ucygAHYW/gLEauNMvfsSpjZJinU0b+JHMlRTZXMos370kz6Ovkgq vVu40vR4WtDgB7XFyfy+aryp+RPzUhJbwwRr7820qwsoSsVVw3uyf6IiD7ZumzgNvkDI QoZBPgGOFTFatqV9PxVO4PCzxhjlI8X75TYP4/N2X1hGC3cRGrKNQi9iD9cPN/Lm8UcX 5+fysxLmy4TlO9+1yZAKZJkz7dilwUD0jtnRoZ46ZdPuM1G5M/bCPp4w0wIzuLb92JLU CeP0ohF8VkVI/QgZA2Zghc/T+UaB0vMS8c6Fljh+O+cmFQf691WoWm/seJ3ZEnVe+r3i kOwg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkeuKIACZBrRDiZ2uiHIb93VprfZrpQUlz8IeQHW2vB5b/39V8HzchajsodU6Rphzfl2/96 X-Received: by 10.68.69.5 with SMTP id a5mr30864651pbu.57.1422895275294; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:c:a700:272f:c42b:9a19:c8d3:f701? ([2601:c:a700:272f:c42b:9a19:c8d3:f701]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nj8sm19322856pdb.42.2015.02.02.08.41.13 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:41:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54CFA8A5.7090504@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:41:09 -0800 From: akuster User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , openembeded-devel References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:41:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Khem, If I knew what "testing' entailed I would through some time at this. - Armin On 02/02/2015 02:02 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All > > I have put together upgrade to gcc 4.9.2 as well as glibc 2.21 ( > upcoming ) on a contrib branch ( top 2 patches) its has not got much > testing besides x86 qemu thus far. > > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/gcc-glibc-upgrade > > I would like to request some help in testing these out in your > respective environments and please report any issues you see so we can > start sorting them out at earlier and making its way into OE-Core. > > Thanks for your help > > -Khem >