From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 51A42E008BC; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:25:09 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (akuster808[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD01BE0086F for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id rd3so88267544pab.9 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:25:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rg6CNnyb41KfGDHF/8sDA5VjUlMWY4g5HApvLY6jyFU=; b=P3818rIvebPupkUqBvc4c/F2pnvyRvejAZtkZAUhW5SRfg22nw/80AV/oGO3E9dvBT fi45XS00BSKSGPxQKnfk/XCvwFiIp/9NjVUVfupduBDSsCh5AJNKJ4aY4WFJSEZRPvnU OmV8ev1goGvHvYUGdrGLjcOTnmcCiyKaL3O2gv9/QqHJnEPCaQ4RnEyq12f40uWM8o1e S01Vb0a710AL41aXieFzQW8TzksYKuMk2J6Zs9EATI1zTiOQqU+voOgb812IA3R/3VZU 1GtXP9ws4PcM90RmnuixDt3ttPzoVaDmb/uX38pcmkBdB/OKmGywhuKZGgLFEibubSbD tDNw== X-Received: by 10.66.65.75 with SMTP id v11mr32382332pas.81.1422919504473; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:c:a700:272f:c42b:9a19:c8d3:f701? ([2601:c:a700:272f:c42b:9a19:c8d3:f701]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c2sm149835pdi.25.2015.02.02.15.25.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:25:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54D0074A.50903@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:24:58 -0800 From: akuster808 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <1422891351-17215-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <101638424.af5YciAOUL@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <54CFC0D5.7050703@gmail.com> <4593095.TQ4VoJlUyp@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4593095.TQ4VoJlUyp@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: [meta-security][PATCH] layer conf: update to include meta-networking X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:25:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit layer index updated. I will update README next. thanks, Armin On 02/02/2015 10:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 02 February 2015 10:24:21 akuster808 wrote: >> On 02/02/2015 08:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> Can you please also update the OE layer index? >> >> Do I do that manually or is it picked up from the README? > > No, it needs to be done manually, I don't have anything to parse a README and > extract dependencies at the moment. > >>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-securit >>> y/ >>> >>> I added meta-perl and meta-oe this morning based on the meta-security >>> README - the latter isn't represented in your LAYERDEPENDS value though, >>> so all three places ought to be made consistent with whatever the actual >>> set of requirements is. >>> >>> (If people are starting to use LAYERDEPENDS a bit more it might make sense >>> for us to add some code to the layer index update script to try to update >>> its dependency list based upon LAYERDEPENDS and BBFILE_COLLECTIONS; up to >>> now it hasn't seen a huge amount of use hence I hadn't done that.) >> >> Is the idea to include all layers required including the cascaded ones? >> >> i.e: meta-networking requires mete-python, should I include that one too? > > No, no need to do that - just the direct dependencies is enough. > > Cheers, > Paul >