From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7243DE0076F; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 07:43:32 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (jfabernathy[at]outlook.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [65.54.190.147 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from BAY004-OMC3S9.hotmail.com (bay004-omc3s9.hotmail.com [65.54.190.147]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16401E005B4 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 07:43:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from BAY169-W27 ([65.54.190.187]) by BAY004-OMC3S9.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 07:43:20 -0800 X-TMN: [jCoFpdsvB0cz9bUuqcxcppugrKQXJlFg] X-Originating-Email: [jfabernathy@outlook.com] Message-ID: From: Jim Abernathy To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:43:19 -0500 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2015 15:43:20.0322 (UTC) FILETIME=[22C6FE20:01D03FC8] Subject: DNS nameservers in Yocto X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:43:32 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_ad68faa1-8c0f-4d84-ba22-2f1f45f4918b_" --_ad68faa1-8c0f-4d84-ba22-2f1f45f4918b_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I find that for Static IPs=2C I have to manually add my DNS name servers to= /etc/resolv.conf instead of what I'm use to and that's put the line in /et= c/network/interfaces with the dns-nameserver [IP] [IP]. My knowledge base comes from Ubuntu Server where putting everything in "/et= c/network/interfaces" covers most things. Anyone know why? Jim A = --_ad68faa1-8c0f-4d84-ba22-2f1f45f4918b_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I find that for Static IPs=2C I = have to manually add my DNS name servers to /etc/resolv.conf instead of wha= t I'm use to and that's put the line in /etc/network/interfaces with the dn= s-nameserver [IP] [IP].

My knowledge base comes from Ubuntu Server w= here putting everything in "/etc/network/interfaces" covers most things.
Anyone know why?

Jim A

= --_ad68faa1-8c0f-4d84-ba22-2f1f45f4918b_-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 62013E0076F; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:21:08 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [96.114.154.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Greylist: delayed 62 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 09:21:06 PST Received: from resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.171]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF86E005B4 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:21:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from resomta-po-17v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.241]) by resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ntKv1p0025Clt1L01tL3N8; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:20:03 +0000 Received: from mail.ripperd.com ([76.17.232.85]) by resomta-po-17v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ntL21p00S1rCZNL01tL3fB; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:20:03 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.6] (unknown [10.0.1.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ripperd.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1F61663AE; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:20:01 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54D10341.2090300@ripperd.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:20:01 -0600 From: Dean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Abernathy , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" References: In-Reply-To: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1422984003; bh=CCskGB2HVPZuYywVhnoBi287MwutPWSZQXKE/DJgTlw=; h=Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To: Subject:Content-Type; b=DONwsC/8alNfUT+kzlHDVMLuiqDKZ5dQlnWLho59P+Aqv81JHn2mXvKiVb7jRCAzm bPPQsTDxA35y9AtAy+fNrqCMWgEX85bASjSj/xcGa3ZdJd25EybzBBpURPfAaFu0ij 8XVaJIo4QIbc8lo1B3VzAfO0jswpFbWHLdP5fq82qCEaxU3IMbVFzRMjwqfpGF5Muw SdjhBK2KGcTY2VRqZufaJSU9LV06J3rxO/929xTuDJ2vmpHLUpVsgH8ry9601MQeyD 6uAtmwSZ4OuonxzGDt/6vRSpPb+o0Feaom4CmvpU9I5OJJaPqOwDLUN7PusdZv9F2Q F4HXI9XYxKSsA== Subject: Re: DNS nameservers in Yocto X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:21:08 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080900010509040307010708" --------------080900010509040307010708 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Add resolvconf to your image. That being said, I'm using dora and the package there was very incomplete. I had to add quite a bit in a .bbappend to make it work properly. On 2/3/2015 9:43 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote: > I find that for Static IPs, I have to manually add my DNS name servers > to /etc/resolv.conf instead of what I'm use to and that's put the line > in /etc/network/interfaces with the dns-nameserver [IP] [IP]. > > My knowledge base comes from Ubuntu Server where putting everything in > "/etc/network/interfaces" covers most things. > > Anyone know why? > > Jim A > > > --------------080900010509040307010708 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Add resolvconf to your image.

That being said, I'm using dora and the package there was very incomplete. I had to add quite a bit in a .bbappend to make it work properly.


On 2/3/2015 9:43 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote:
I find that for Static IPs, I have to manually add my DNS name servers to /etc/resolv.conf instead of what I'm use to and that's put the line in /etc/network/interfaces with the dns-nameserver [IP] [IP].

My knowledge base comes from Ubuntu Server where putting everything in "/etc/network/interfaces" covers most things.

Anyone know why?

Jim A




--------------080900010509040307010708-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 954E7E0076F; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:11:21 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652FDE005B4 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:11:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2015 10:11:13 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,514,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="672164390" Received: from unknown (HELO peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.252.17.39]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2015 10:11:12 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: Dean Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:11:12 +0000 Message-ID: <3808650.TK1iGa17XP@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.17.8-200.fc20.x86_64; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54D10341.2090300@ripperd.com> References: <54D10341.2090300@ripperd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: DNS nameservers in Yocto X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:11:21 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Dean, On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:20:01 Dean wrote: > On 2/3/2015 9:43 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote: > > I find that for Static IPs, I have to manually add my DNS name servers > > to /etc/resolv.conf instead of what I'm use to and that's put the line > > in /etc/network/interfaces with the dns-nameserver [IP] [IP]. > > > > My knowledge base comes from Ubuntu Server where putting everything in > > "/etc/network/interfaces" covers most things. > > > > Anyone know why? > > Add resolvconf to your image. > > That being said, I'm using dora and the package there was very > incomplete. I had to add quite a bit in a .bbappend to make it work > properly. Would the issues you found have been fixed by this commit? http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=35e0a3eb6725781eb291b3fa90694a68c3b64c60 If not, we should really try to get these fixed in the original recipe - we'd certainly appreciate help there. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 9AE83E0076F; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:25:13 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (jfabernathy[at]outlook.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [65.54.190.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from BAY004-OMC2S24.hotmail.com (bay004-omc2s24.hotmail.com [65.54.190.99]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7045CE005B4 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:25:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from BAY169-W56 ([65.54.190.124]) by BAY004-OMC2S24.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:25:08 -0800 X-TMN: [z8lOhjjbrUzAbnFNUr327OlrQGBhyfs6] X-Originating-Email: [jfabernathy@outlook.com] Message-ID: From: Jim Abernathy To: Paul Eggleton , Dean Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:25:08 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3808650.TK1iGa17XP@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <54D10341.2090300@ripperd.com>, <3808650.TK1iGa17XP@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2015 19:25:08.0501 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F11F450:01D03FE7] Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: DNS nameservers in Yocto X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:25:13 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_f39b9d96-79d0-42a5-8bd6-c65db6207c0e_" --_f39b9d96-79d0-42a5-8bd6-c65db6207c0e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > From: paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com > To: dean@ripperd.com > CC: jfabernathy@outlook.com=3B yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [yocto] DNS nameservers in Yocto > Date: Tue=2C 3 Feb 2015 18:11:12 +0000 >=20 > Hi Dean=2C >=20 > On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:20:01 Dean wrote: > > On 2/3/2015 9:43 AM=2C Jim Abernathy wrote: > > > I find that for Static IPs=2C I have to manually add my DNS name serv= ers > > > to /etc/resolv.conf instead of what I'm use to and that's put the lin= e > > > in /etc/network/interfaces with the dns-nameserver [IP] [IP]. > > >=20 > > > My knowledge base comes from Ubuntu Server where putting everything i= n > > > "/etc/network/interfaces" covers most things. > > >=20 > > > Anyone know why? > > > > Add resolvconf to your image. > >=20 > > That being said=2C I'm using dora and the package there was very > > incomplete. I had to add quite a bit in a .bbappend to make it work > > properly. >=20 > Would the issues you found have been fixed by this commit? >=20 > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=3D35e0a3eb672= 5781eb291b3fa90694a68c3b64c60 >=20 > If not=2C we should really try to get these fixed in the original recipe = - we'd=20 > certainly appreciate help there. >=20 > Cheers=2C > Paul >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre Just adding 'resolvconf' fixed my issue on dizzy. Jim A = --_f39b9d96-79d0-42a5-8bd6-c65db6207c0e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


>=3B From: paul.e= ggleton@linux.intel.com
>=3B To: dean@ripperd.com
>=3B CC: jfaber= nathy@outlook.com=3B yocto@yoctoproject.org
>=3B Subject: Re: [yocto] = DNS nameservers in Yocto
>=3B Date: Tue=2C 3 Feb 2015 18:11:12 +0000>=3B
>=3B Hi Dean=2C
>=3B
>=3B On Tuesday 03 February = 2015 11:20:01 Dean wrote:
>=3B >=3B On 2/3/2015 9:43 AM=2C Jim Abern= athy wrote:
>=3B >=3B >=3B I find that for Static IPs=2C I have to= manually add my DNS name servers
>=3B >=3B >=3B to /etc/resolv.co= nf instead of what I'm use to and that's put the line
>=3B >=3B >= =3B in /etc/network/interfaces with the dns-nameserver [IP] [IP].
>=3B= >=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B >=3B My knowledge base comes from Ubuntu= Server where putting everything in
>=3B >=3B >=3B "/etc/network/i= nterfaces" covers most things.
>=3B >=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B &g= t=3B Anyone know why?
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B Add resolvconf to y= our image.
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B That being said=2C I'm using = dora and the package there was very
>=3B >=3B incomplete. I had to a= dd quite a bit in a .bbappend to make it work
>=3B >=3B properly.>=3B
>=3B Would the issues you found have been fixed by this commi= t?
>=3B
>=3B http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/co= mmit/?id=3D35e0a3eb6725781eb291b3fa90694a68c3b64c60
>=3B
>=3B If= not=2C we should really try to get these fixed in the original recipe - we= 'd
>=3B certainly appreciate help there.
>=3B
>=3B Cheers= =2C
>=3B Paul
>=3B
>=3B --
>=3B
>=3B Paul Eggle= ton
>=3B Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Just adding 'resol= vconf' fixed my issue on dizzy.

Jim A

= --_f39b9d96-79d0-42a5-8bd6-c65db6207c0e_-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 85830E0076F; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:42:17 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [96.114.154.161 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.161]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A32E005B4 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:42:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from resomta-po-18v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.242]) by resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nvgt1p0035E3ZMc01viBtf; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:42:11 +0000 Received: from mail.ripperd.com ([76.17.232.85]) by resomta-po-18v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nvi91p00T1rCZNL01viAiT; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:42:11 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.6] (unknown [10.0.1.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ripperd.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A2D2663AE; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:42:09 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54D12490.90503@ripperd.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:42:08 -0600 From: Dean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <54D10341.2090300@ripperd.com> <3808650.TK1iGa17XP@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3808650.TK1iGa17XP@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1422992531; bh=2KlRnkHEuYvqHgKhOPaRSe5XP0A8EtLPa0Q07oeIY+A=; h=Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To: Subject:Content-Type; b=R0IQkPcQUnQh42HRJ0Rsffs+htBzjsNoDkcAuALZGqR++1rvuzx1dVkfPJQFkDf6n JQ3WUimN4y6AnaVJLl1jtPaf6b+MOP0BcxMPa699sb1nC1RnAAAb0qPDgyeyMPBP+m 4hfiy+n+erm1YMEYVaAuelh9Sbk1fKDg71xGGzwJTNPndPoPhVOL5DQ5XQGMtVczhm IOMbxUfcPXoumm2l/ShJ5SEpY03zT6aIrlsMlz3AEgkZrF7OqPLTf9/PAC3LGtKXMm 10HIt1E+EbJvifWy/vo0YfM97qc6xj/+JZMP815pgqgzBBELGEB+jae4iwh5Fidyjx OatYTaOJGZt8g== Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: DNS nameservers in Yocto X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:42:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/3/2015 12:11 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Dean, > > On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:20:01 Dean wrote: >> On 2/3/2015 9:43 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote: >>> I find that for Static IPs, I have to manually add my DNS name servers >>> to /etc/resolv.conf instead of what I'm use to and that's put the line >>> in /etc/network/interfaces with the dns-nameserver [IP] [IP]. >>> >>> My knowledge base comes from Ubuntu Server where putting everything in >>> "/etc/network/interfaces" covers most things. >>> >>> Anyone know why? >> Add resolvconf to your image. >> >> That being said, I'm using dora and the package there was very >> incomplete. I had to add quite a bit in a .bbappend to make it work >> properly. > Would the issues you found have been fixed by this commit? > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=35e0a3eb6725781eb291b3fa90694a68c3b64c60 > > If not, we should really try to get these fixed in the original recipe - we'd > certainly appreciate help there. > > Cheers, > Paul > Yeah, that's about 95% of it. I don't think it has a service yet though? Here is my .bbappend. It probably isn't perfect or bug free, but working on my dora builds. I think I ripped the scripts out of the debian packages and then fixed anything necessary to make them work with busybox. cat resolvconf_1.74.bbappend # Added by Dean to fix issues in resolvconf recipe # look for files in this layer first FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:" SRC_URI += " file://fixpath.patch \ file://resolvconf.init \ file://netresolvconfdown \ file://netresolvconfup \ file://pppresolvconfdown \ file://pppresolvconfup " inherit update-rc.d INITSCRIPT_NAME = "resolvconf" INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 39 S . stop 41 0 6 ." # add list-records script, its missing in distro # add volatile resolv.conf - package maintainer didnt??!@?! # Add startup/shutdown script FILES_${PN} += " /lib/resolvconf/list-records " do_install_append () { install -d ${D}/lib/${BPN} install -m 0755 bin/list-records ${D}/lib/${BPN}/ echo "l root root 0644 /etc/resolv.conf ${sysconfdir}/${BPN}/run/resolv.conf" >> ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles/99_resolvconf echo "f root root 0644 ${sysconfdir}/${BPN}/run/resolv.conf none" >> ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/volatiles/99_resolvconf install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d cp ${WORKDIR}/resolvconf.init ${WORKDIR}/resolvconf install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/resolvconf ${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d/ # Add things needed for interfaces coming up and down install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/network/if-down.d/ install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/network/if-up.d/ install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/ppp/ip-down.d/ install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/ppp/ip-up.d/ install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/netresolvconfdown ${D}${sysconfdir}/network/if-down.d/resolvconf install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/netresolvconfup ${D}${sysconfdir}/network/if-up.d/000resolvconf install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/pppresolvconfdown ${D}${sysconfdir}/ppp/ip-down.d/000resolvconf install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/pppresolvconfup ${D}${sysconfdir}/ppp/ip-up.d/000resolvconf }