Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 02/04/2015 08:21 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>> On 02/04/2015 05:26 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The next release I will be making will be next-20150209 - which will
>>>> probably be after the v3.19 release.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20150203:
>>>>
>>>> The sound-asoc tree gained a conflict against the sound tree.
>>>>
>>>> The scsi tree gained a build failure caused by an interaction with the
>>>> driver-core tree.  I applied a merge fix patch.
>>>>
>>>> The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I disabled
>>>> CONFIG_KASAN.
>>>>
>>>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7461
>>>>    7314 files changed, 309736 insertions(+), 172363 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>> [ CC Jens ]
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am seeing the following in my logs several times...
>>>
>>> Feb  4 02:53:13 fambox kernel: [15507.397482] blk_update_request: I/O
>>> error, dev loop0, sector 21261344
>>> Feb  4 02:53:13 fambox kernel: [15507.397531] loop0: DISCARD failed.
>>> Manually zeroing.
>>
>>
>> This is from Martin's commit (CC'ed). Martin, there are various ways we can
>> end up "failing" from blkdev_issue_discard(), I'm going to kill those debug
>> warnings.
>>
>
> [ Really CC Martin :-) ]

Ooops, thanks :-)

> Caused by this one...?
>
> commit d93ba7a5a97c9f315bacdcdb8de4e5f368e7b396
> "block: Add discard flag to blkdev_issue_zeroout() function"

That's the one.

-- 
Jens Axboe