All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug in mount options handling in EXT4?
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:52:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D2F72B.2040408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1502050525310.1476@gmail.com>

On 2/4/15 10:26 PM, Enrico Mioso wrote:
> That's fine - as long as we can say that a possibly very very big of "nobarrier" options could be stored some place in memory and cause damage.
> Thank you for the reply and attention.
> Please - don't remove me from CC as I am not subscribed to any list.
> 
> Enrico

Hm, I see now that every "remount" extends the string, that wasn't quite clear from your first email (I thought you simply specified the same option multiple times):

> sudo mount -t ext4 -o rw,noatime,nobarrier,nobarrier,nobarrier, ... 

On my system, remounting with nobarrier a loop eventually fails with:

[mntent]: line 13 in /etc/mtab is bad; rest of file ignored
mount: can't find mnt in /etc/fstab or /etc/mtab

But that's not super graceful.  Anyway, this has a bit to do with how util-linux
manages /etc/mtab too, I guess.

On a system where /etc/mtab links to /proc/mounts, I don't see that behavior.

I do think that the length of the string copied from the user during mount (which is what's going on here) is properly sanitized in copy_mount_options().

-Eric

      reply	other threads:[~2015-02-05  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-05  3:22 Bug in mount options handling in EXT4? Enrico Mioso
2015-02-05  3:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-02-05  4:26   ` Enrico Mioso
2015-02-05  4:52     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D2F72B.2040408@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrkiko.rs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.