All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guang Chen <chenxg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 1/6] qemu-iotests: run qemu with -nodefaults
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:22:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D37C95.3060101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423107872-3268-2-git-send-email-chenxg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 2015-02-04 at 22:44, Xiao Guang Chen wrote:
> This patch fixes an io test suite issue that was introduced with the
> commit c88930a6866e74953e931ae749781e98e486e5c8 'qemu-char: Permit only
> a single "stdio" character device'. The option supresses the creation of
> default devices.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guang Chen <chenxg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>   tests/qemu-iotests/common        | 1 +
>   tests/qemu-iotests/common.config | 2 +-
>   tests/qemu-iotests/common.qemu   | 2 +-
>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I think this patch and patch 3 are fine, but there is no reason not to 
squash 3 into 1. The reason I'm suggesting that once again is that it 
prevents tests 067, 071, and 087 from breaking (which would be a really 
nice thing).

So if you decide not to squash them I'll probably give an Reviewed-by 
anyway, but you really should consider doing it.

Max

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-05 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-05  3:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 0/6] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 1/6] qemu-iotests: run qemu with -nodefaults Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05  3:52   ` Fam Zheng
2015-02-05  5:52     ` chen xiao guang
2015-02-05 14:22   ` Max Reitz [this message]
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 2/6] qemu-iotests: qemu machine type support Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05 14:18   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-05 17:57     ` Eric Blake
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 3/6] qemu-iotests: fix tests 067, 071 and 087 Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 4/6] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 041 Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05 14:26   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 5/6] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 051 Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05 15:11   ` Max Reitz
2015-02-09  8:06     ` chen xiao guang
2015-02-09 14:35       ` Max Reitz
2015-02-05  3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 6/6] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 055 Xiao Guang Chen
2015-02-05 15:16   ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D37C95.3060101@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=chenxg@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.