From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <picmaster@mail.bg>
Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118)
	id 5FFEDE00894; Thu,  5 Feb 2015 09:50:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	yocto-www.yoctoproject.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser
	mail provider *      (picmaster[at]mail.bg)
	* -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	low *      trust
	*      [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	* -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	*      [score: 0.0000]
	* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's *       domain
	*  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
	*      valid
	* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF64E007AB
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Thu,  5 Feb 2015 09:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.40] (unknown [93.152.143.60])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB6D76003425;
	Thu,  5 Feb 2015 19:50:14 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default;
	t=1423158614; bh=5Owl0dUxp+OQFncBkrFWmXcgNE+QINa/1BQo2zV283E=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:
	In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=/xZcWdUo6sfBgJAJL9oZZX4MMu6sJm0mlF3HuhvPuodPLMuBOdE56NpydjCbjfThm
	5kBGW9l28LwYKVZNJygb9C0RvexAuOUXAbJFGtvg2gxLHzKMesCc2xCIDGy1LlDRBo
	BmAIFSh/gGOIOr3RB9eIZ1l36V+1zk9M4rZn+YBg=
Message-ID: <54D3AD56.3030100@mail.bg>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 19:50:14 +0200
From: Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
References: <54D13832.7010609@mail.bg>
	<CAP9ODKpjYCB+qH+AVVjg+QaMqWWG-4nz5WLo+OqAhvk_oEL3xQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKpjYCB+qH+AVVjg+QaMqWWG-4nz5WLo+OqAhvk_oEL3xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: U-Boot preferred provider (dizzy)
X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers
	<meta-freescale.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale>
List-Post: <mailto:meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:50:22 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Otavio,

On 02/05/2015 01:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Nikolay,
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg> wrote:
>> Is it needed to set both PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot and
>> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader variables in my machine file?
>>
>> This was the way done in Daisy, but now in Dizzy I see more boards are
>> only using PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot. The latter obviously works, the
>> question is which is the right way to do it :D.
>
> In fact, both are not optimal. I need to rework this.
>
> We need to set just virtual/bootloader and the system to infer all the
> rest. I will try to get this going...

Thanks!