All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: allow CFLAGS specification in new build
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:08:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D3DBD3.80701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D3D31D.40802@redhat.com>

On 2/5/15 2:31 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Disclaimer: I am not an auto$FOO expert by any means.
> 
> But I could find no way to specify additional CFLAGS, and I think
> that this is because they are hard-coded in configure.ac.
> 
> The below works for me, but I don't know if it's the right solution...

gah, looking at the wrong branch in git.  Never mind.

-Eric


      reply	other threads:[~2015-02-05 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-05 20:31 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: allow CFLAGS specification in new build Eric Sandeen
2015-02-05 21:08 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D3DBD3.80701@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.