From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: RBD tests on the next dumpling release Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 23:30:14 +0100 Message-ID: <54D3EEF6.1070701@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nv1rxLovoLN4d3SbU6RreGCWwkLLfwLrI" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:39495 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079AbbBEWaR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:30:17 -0500 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jason Dillaman , Josh Durgin Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nv1rxLovoLN4d3SbU6RreGCWwkLLfwLrI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jason & Josh, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10773 is the last unresolved issue for the= next dumpling point release. I tried to collect information about the pr= oblem but I'm not sure if it should be a blocker or not. I suspect it's n= ot but ... what do you think ? For the record, the commits that are included in the backport branch bein= g tested are summarized here : http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-bac= kports/wikis/dumpling up to and including http://workbench.dachary.org/ce= ph/ceph-backports/wikis/dumpling#pull-requests-waiting-to-be-integrated Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --nv1rxLovoLN4d3SbU6RreGCWwkLLfwLrI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTT7vYACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23cKQCeMg26pU30wbvCL98fZCppSqvB eOMAniR+dzw2b054TCwogIg/YRK7q44r =ehpM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nv1rxLovoLN4d3SbU6RreGCWwkLLfwLrI--