All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Lutz Vieweg <lvml@5t9.de>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can I get a checksum for a file from btrfs (without reading the whole file)?
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:20:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D44F2A.8090108@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mavhab$f8m$1@ger.gmane.org>


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Can I get a checksum for a file from btrfs (without reading the 
whole file)?
From: Lutz Vieweg <lvml@5t9.de>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Date: 2015年02月05日 18:40
> Hi,
>
> use case: You have two huge files on a btrfs, you assume they contain 
> the same bytes,
> but you do not know for sure.
>
> Is there a way to get a checksum of both files from btrfs with less 
> effort than
> reading the whole of both files and computing a hash sum?
For short, NO.

For long:
For current implement, btrfs use calculate 4K sector into 4bytes(32bit) 
crc32 and restore it into csum tree.

So, for large files, e.g. 1G(already quite small for modern storage), 
its checksum will be 1M in size.
Which means even using crc32 (same as kernel and crc32(a+b) = crc32(a) + 
crc32(b)), you still needs to
do crc32 on the all 1M crc32.
And if you want other checksum like md5/sha256, you have no choice but 
read them all and calculate.


But there is still some case btrfs can help you determine whether the 
files are the same in a faster way.
Prerequisite:
The two files are copied using clone(cp --reflink command) or 
deduplicated(see btrfs 
wiki:https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Deduplication)

Method:
If cloned/deduplicated, file will share same file extents (one can up to 
128M).
So you can compare file extents to compare the whole file.
Per 128M compare will be definitely faster. (if not modified after cp 
--clone or deduplication)

I didn't see such implement yet, so it's just a concept...

Thanks,
Qu
>
> (I was thinking that the btrfs-internal CRCs might be of use, here...)
>
> Regards,
>
> Lutz Vieweg
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-06  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-05 10:40 Can I get a checksum for a file from btrfs (without reading the whole file)? Lutz Vieweg
2015-02-06  5:20 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-02-06 13:00   ` Lutz Vieweg
2015-02-06 18:04     ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D44F2A.8090108@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvml@5t9.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.