From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id CAA99E0080C; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 05:15:27 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497E4E00757 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 05:15:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.123] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22EF06001531; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:15:18 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1423228518; bh=BeC5jOXwuqBgCR0YLqyztnsxHmjaObu/CRfwtxjN/TA=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yMdW4RTLQ8wmKYuAOd0WNiRG7CGBBviNn9pBZy5kHAvAl3I2X206zpDQ//RXTdK6q +XYsa7lCKP8Sim/4nl+cB3IkMRvhfaQIy0OZ/fEWcvzvIl9agESRtm+3KwyRXizUjc zjsUpxbAHWq4ohxuwBQ9dFwjxJojO8O+tZm1tQSo= Message-ID: <54D4BE66.1000404@mail.bg> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 15:15:18 +0200 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <54D3AD62.1000204@mail.bg> <54D4A3C4.4040402@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: How to enable bad plugins on gstreamer1.0 (dizzy) X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:15:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Otavio, On 02/06/2015 02:19 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> On 02/06/2015 12:51 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote: >>> As I understand, any *-meta is not supposed to be a recipe, but a >>> sub-package instead. >> >> Yes, I found the same this morning. I'm still not sure of all the >> complications of marking a recipe with "-meta", this "requires more >> thinking" :D. > > This happens here: > > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst-plugins-package.inc#n15 > Thanks. >>> And, I'm not sure if 'mpegtsdemux' would be part of bad-meta, as >>> bad-meta only have a set of plugins, some of them are not included in >>> -meta (due to license, e.g.) >> >> Well, it should be there - it's available in the upstream repo, and >> also I just was able to add it to my build. It turned out that in my >> edit/build cycle I somehow had the wrong configuration (packagegroup- >> fslc-gstreamer1.0-full was not enabled), so thus my issue. >> >> Here's my recipe for testing gstreamer1.0 (it's copied/edited from the >> other recipes in meta-fsl-demos): >> >> >> diff --git >> a/sources/meta-fsl-demos/recipes-fsl/images/fsl-image-gstreamer1.0.bb >> b/sources/meta-fsl-demos/recipes-fsl/images/fsl-image-gstreamer1.0.bb >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..90e2715 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/sources/meta-fsl-demos/recipes-fsl/images/fsl-image-gstreamer1.0.bb >> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ >> +DESCRIPTION = "A console-only image that includes gstreamer packages and \ >> +Freescale's multimedia packages (VPU and GPU) when available for the >> specific \ >> +machine." >> + >> +IMAGE_FEATURES += "\ >> + ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', 'x11-base', '', d)} \ >> +" >> + >> +LICENSE = "MIT" >> + >> +inherit core-image >> + >> +CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL += " \ >> + packagegroup-fslc-gstreamer1.0-full \ >> + packagegroup-fsl-tools-gpu \ >> +" >> >> So I guess this solves my issue. > > We have this in fsl-image-multimedia since long time ago. Well, here's the content of fsl-image-multimedia.bb: DESCRIPTION = "A console-only image that includes gstreamer packages and \ Freescale's multimedia packages (VPU and GPU) when available for the specific \ machine." IMAGE_FEATURES += "\ ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', 'x11-base', '', d)} \ " LICENSE = "MIT" inherit core-image CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL += " \ packagegroup-fsl-gstreamer \ packagegroup-fsl-tools-gpu \ ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'directfb', 'packagegroup-core-directfb', '', d)} \ ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', '', \ base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'wayland', \ 'weston weston-init weston-examples \ gtk+3-demo clutter-1.0-examples', '', d), d)} \ " It seems like it's using gstreamer-0.10, and not gstreamer1.0. Please tell me if I'm looking at the wrong place. > I double checked the meta package: > > dpkg -I ~/.../tmp/deploy/ipk/cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-mx6qdl/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-meta_1.4.5-r0.1_cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-mx6qdl.ipk > | grep Depends: | tr ',' '\n' | grep mpegts > gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-mpegtsmux > libgstmpegts-1.0-0 > gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-mpegtsdemux > > So it seems alright. > Regards, Nikolay