From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 05/12] xen: Introduce vm_event Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:58:27 +0000 Message-ID: <54D4C883.70000@citrix.com> References: <1422567998-29995-1-git-send-email-tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> <1422567998-29995-6-git-send-email-tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> <54D0FD39020000780005C792@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tamas K Lengyel , Jan Beulich Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , "wei.liu2@citrix.com" , Ian Campbell , Razvan Cojocaru , Stefano Stabellini , "Dong, Eddie" , Tim Deegan , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Steven Maresca , Andres Lagar-Cavilla , Jun Nakajima , "rshriram@cs.ubc.ca" , Keir Fraser , Daniel De Graaf , "yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com" , Ian Jackson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/02/15 13:54, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> Please clarify in the patch description whether this (and perhaps >> other) copied or cloned code is really just a plain copy with some >> renaming, or whether there are any other changes. Reviewing this >> as a non-renaming change isn't time well spent in the former case. > Ack, this code is identical to mem_event beside the name. Using git format-patch/diff -M will make this much more obvious by creating a diff which looks something like: --- a/xen/common/mem_event.c +++ b/xen/common/vm_event.c and contains hunks renaming the functions alone. ~Andrew