From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/MM: Introduce a p2m class. Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:18:42 +0000 Message-ID: <54D50582.5040708@citrix.com> References: <1422578612-8826-1-git-send-email-edmund.h.white@intel.com> <54CB5DC8.4090307@citrix.com> <54D50411.50105@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D50411.50105@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ed White , Andrew Cooper , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: keir@xen.org, tim@xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/02/15 18:12, Ed White wrote: > On 01/30/2015 02:32 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 30/01/15 00:43, Ed White wrote: >>> Use the class to differentiate between host and nested p2m's, and >>> potentially other classes in the future. >>> >>> Fix p2m class checks that implicitly assume nested and host are >>> the only two classes that will ever exist. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ed White >>> Acked-by: Tim Deegan >> >> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper >> > > Is there anything else I need to do before this is applied? Check the staging branch. This is applied. David