From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ed White Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/MM: Introduce a p2m class. Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:24:49 -0800 Message-ID: <54D506F1.7060007@intel.com> References: <1422578612-8826-1-git-send-email-edmund.h.white@intel.com> <54CB5DC8.4090307@citrix.com> <54D50411.50105@intel.com> <54D50551.3090806@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D50551.3090806@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: tim@xen.org, keir@xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/06/2015 10:17 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 06/02/15 18:12, Ed White wrote: >> On 01/30/2015 02:32 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> On 30/01/15 00:43, Ed White wrote: >>>> Use the class to differentiate between host and nested p2m's, and >>>> potentially other classes in the future. >>>> >>>> Fix p2m class checks that implicitly assume nested and host are >>>> the only two classes that will ever exist. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ed White >>>> Acked-by: Tim Deegan >>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper >>> >> Is there anything else I need to do before this is applied? >> >> Ed > > It is already committed > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=8fe99c468d977ee077ef064618973e0aca578117 Thanks. I was expecting it to turn up on xen-changelog, but that's obviously not the right way to check. Ed