From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1YKCAh-0003GH-V0 for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:40:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKCAf-0003D8-Kp for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:40:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKCAe-0002MP-U8 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:40:05 -0500 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:54288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKCAa-0002EP-SK; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:40:01 -0500 Received: from [192.168.88.2] (mjt.vpn.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.99]) by isrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB88B41468; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 23:39:57 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <54D6781D.7030400@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 23:39:57 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <1422270747-23994-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <54D5D416.6040704@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <54D66F36.5080200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54D66F36.5080200@redhat.com> OpenPGP: id=804465C5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.62.121.231 Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Amit Shah , armbru@redhat.com, Juan Quintela Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 0/7] Six coverity fixes and a cleanup X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 20:40:06 -0000 07.02.2015 23:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/02/2015 10:00, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>>> Patch 2 is the cleanup. The other six patches make the tcg, utils and >>>> migration components clean. >> Applied to -trivial patches 1,2,3,4 and 6, not applied 5 (due to >> questionable errno checking addition) and 7, due to a discussion. > > Thanks, will resubmit 5. > > Juan/Amit, can you pick up 7 which Juan has already reviewed? I've no prob with 7, but please let's agree which way we're taking there -- whenever subsequent fixes are needed, should be made on the top of this change, or whole thing should be done differently. Thanks. /mjt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKCAe-0003CZ-7O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:40:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKCAb-0002FQ-2Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:40:04 -0500 Message-ID: <54D6781D.7030400@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 23:39:57 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1422270747-23994-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <54D5D416.6040704@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <54D66F36.5080200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54D66F36.5080200@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 0/7] Six coverity fixes and a cleanup List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Amit Shah , armbru@redhat.com, Juan Quintela 07.02.2015 23:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/02/2015 10:00, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>>> Patch 2 is the cleanup. The other six patches make the tcg, utils and >>>> migration components clean. >> Applied to -trivial patches 1,2,3,4 and 6, not applied 5 (due to >> questionable errno checking addition) and 7, due to a discussion. > > Thanks, will resubmit 5. > > Juan/Amit, can you pick up 7 which Juan has already reviewed? I've no prob with 7, but please let's agree which way we're taking there -- whenever subsequent fixes are needed, should be made on the top of this change, or whole thing should be done differently. Thanks. /mjt