From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 69B08E00848; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 04:13:40 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB0FE007AB for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 04:13:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.40] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2183760003B6; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 14:13:33 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1423397613; bh=eMVc69i5QC5B4JjIR23ceX58aq+Ua9oKIXRilB9UTvU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GpyoJVv33pguTYuiIiHfHuu86YY0mSONmRrsua6oKwmF2PIFYmhdMuGsLDiYpx/mD JDEMzkyqE8gXUSz/3piClSI/BAFJi2Ys0ZoXN6gnQcJKh4THUw9ubrVoXsuUFA30md zOapyqPuwIj+iuduBJo55+cdLASkPiGjuJDWveXM= Message-ID: <54D752ED.7070908@mail.bg> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:13:33 +0200 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1423232976-23141-1-git-send-email-picmaster@mail.bg> <20150206154851.67df3156@e6520eb.localdomain> <54D4DBBE.1080505@mail.bg> <54D742EF.8010307@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] linux-imx: Disable imx6sl code when not needed (3.10.17) X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:13:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Otavio, On 02/08/2015 01:26 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> On 02/06/2015 05:51 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > ... >>> Did you check if 3.10.53 also needs this? >> >> >> Nope, as I can't test it easily. If someone volunteers to test the >> patch there, I can submit it. > > Sure. We can test it. > > We need to fix the issue on master to be able to backport it later. So > please prepare the patch for master and we try to test it. > > Basically we need to test: > > a Q or DL SoC with SL disabled > a SL with Q and DL SoC with Q and DL support disabled > > is that correct? My understanding for testing the patch was quite similar with one small difference: - test Q/D/DL SoC with SL disabled - test Q/D/DL SoC with SL enabled This patch doesn't change the Q/DL codepath, so I don't see a justification for testing it. Regards, Nikolay