From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:12:58 +0100 Message-ID: <54D8882A.6010804@dachary.org> References: <54D3EEF6.1070701@dachary.org> <1050495133.7647881.1423231520223.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <54D4CD03.8000806@dachary.org> <408976183.7693525.1423233776228.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pGa2LbVfJrEKxaVwapO2sldB9ohG2e6RJ" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:40987 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932238AbbBIKNC (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 05:13:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <408976183.7693525.1423233776228.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jason Dillaman Cc: Josh Durgin , Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pGa2LbVfJrEKxaVwapO2sldB9ohG2e6RJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jason, Your backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 at https://github.co= m/ceph/ceph/pull/3655 was added to the dumpling-backports branch and the = RBD suite run came back with one error. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a058= 86fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february I'm under the impression that this is unrelated. What do you think ? The error found in the previous run http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-fd37e5a9749c5579a= 592ebe926a3c576be0617cd-3-february could not be repeated by another run of the same test http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-05_21:41:04-rbd-dumpling-backports--= -basic-multi/ and I closed the ticket as "Can't reproduce" since you did not reproduce = it locally either. Feel free to change the state of the ticket if, for in= stance, you would like it to remain open during a few weeks in case it sh= ows up again. Cheers On 06/02/2015 15:42, Jason Dillaman wrote: > I would say #9854 is critical for this dumpling point release since it = fixes a regression that would otherwise be introduced by this point relea= se. >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --pGa2LbVfJrEKxaVwapO2sldB9ohG2e6RJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTYiCoACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21pzwCgvPVsaQ+cA+JFNm+3cOavIV6t 4fsAoKjBwOXp6Sa69BYzHkH9r9xb5J+q =Wxcv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pGa2LbVfJrEKxaVwapO2sldB9ohG2e6RJ--