From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rgw and the next dumpling release Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:10:25 +0100 Message-ID: <54D8B1C1.6060106@dachary.org> References: <54D3F0E5.8060906@dachary.org> <974116011.8222626.1423177154743.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <54D3F7C5.6030701@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HLmoX4530bsIkNqfBrOl48rOlRck8qQcc" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:41082 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755759AbbBINK2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:10:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54D3F7C5.6030701@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --HLmoX4530bsIkNqfBrOl48rOlRck8qQcc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yehuda, Your backport of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a9dd4af401328e8f9071= dee52470a0685ceb296b at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3645 was added = to the dumpling-backports branch and the RGW suite run came back green. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a058= 86fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february I should add that because of environmental instability (IMHO) I ran the s= uite twice. That produced at least one successful run of each job. For th= e record the first run is: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-b5e871fe027db3b25= f9129ae3e5b2326a89467c5-6-february Do you think rgw is ready for the next dumpling point release ? Cheers On 06/02/2015 00:07, Loic Dachary wrote: > Thanks ! >=20 > On 05/02/2015 23:59, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Loic Dachary" >>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh" >>> Cc: "Ceph Development" >>> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 2:38:29 PM >>> Subject: rgw and the next dumpling release >>> >>> Hi Yehuda, >>> >>> The rados teuthology suite for the next dumpling release as found in >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports came back gre= en >>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-03_14:46:09-rgw-dumpling-backpor= ts---basic-multi/. >>> Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?= >>> >> >> We should also backport a9dd4af401328e8f9071dee52470a0685ceb296b to du= mpling. I think I saw a dumpling run failing due to the lack of this one,= and since we now run on environments that use apache 2.4. Looking at thi= s commit, it's not going to be applied trivially, so I'm preparing one fo= r dumpling now. >> >> Yehuda >> >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --HLmoX4530bsIkNqfBrOl48rOlRck8qQcc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTYscEACgkQ8dLMyEl6F2244gCfbuQGAL6YPQXEC3pmuSC25i3+ Te0An2zHUk9Bmjcx4yujWknA9BokvlU5 =2G6E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HLmoX4530bsIkNqfBrOl48rOlRck8qQcc--