From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Josh Durgin <jdurgin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:08:24 -0800
Message-ID: <54D94BF8.7080008@redhat.com>
References: <54D3EEF6.1070701@dachary.org> <1050495133.7647881.1423231520223.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <54D4CD03.8000806@dachary.org> <408976183.7693525.1423233776228.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <54D8882A.6010804@dachary.org> <1749420664.9284413.1423513637594.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:43108 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1760105AbbBJAHs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:07:48 -0500
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id kx10so12867081pab.0
        for <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:07:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1749420664.9284413.1423513637594.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Jason Dillaman <dillaman@redhat.com>, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>

On 02/09/2015 12:27 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> I would agree with your assessment that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february sounds like a repeat of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4959.
>
> Josh, thoughts?
>

Yeah, that looks the same. I think we can ignore it.