From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:05:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54DA3A5B.5050509@dachary.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1152 bytes --]
Hi Yuri,
The dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports has been approved by Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE.
For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410
I think it would be best for the QE tests to use the dumpling-backports. The alternative would be to merge dumpling-backports into dumpling. However, since testing may take a long time and require more patches, it probably is better to not do that iterative process on the dumpling branch itself. As it is now, there already are a number of commits in the dumpling branch that should really be in the dumpling-backports: they do not belong to v0.67.11 and are going to be released in v0.67.12. In the future though, the dumpling branch will only receive commits that have been carefully tested and all the integration work will be on the dumpling-backports branch exclusively. So that third parties do not have to worry that the dumpling branch contains commits that have not been tested yet.
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-10 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-10 17:05 Loic Dachary [this message]
2015-02-10 17:19 ` dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-10 17:22 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-10 17:29 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-10 18:04 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-10 18:25 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-02-10 18:33 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-10 18:40 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-02-10 18:37 ` Sage Weil
2015-02-10 19:06 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-10 19:11 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-10 19:15 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-10 17:31 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-02-11 22:24 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-11 22:48 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-12 0:29 ` Josh Durgin
2015-02-12 22:06 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-12 22:17 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-18 17:38 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-18 17:54 ` Samuel Just
2015-02-18 17:56 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-18 18:25 ` Josh Durgin
2015-02-26 0:18 ` Yuri Weinstein
2015-02-26 1:35 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-12 22:23 ` Samuel Just
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54DA3A5B.5050509@dachary.org \
--to=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yweinste@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.