From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:22:58 +0100 Message-ID: <54DA3E72.9010600@dachary.org> References: <54DA3A5B.5050509@dachary.org> <54483038.14900677.1423588756901.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q9hpEAqFpvVRfreDtOdL3f3tcjxojUPoh" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:41886 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751012AbbBJRXB (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:23:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54483038.14900677.1423588756901.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Q9hpEAqFpvVRfreDtOdL3f3tcjxojUPoh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/02/2015 18:19, Yuri Weinstein wrote:>=20 > Loic, >=20 > The only difference between options if we run suits on merged dumpling = vs dumpling-backports first - is time. > We will have to run suites on the final branch after the merge anyway. Could you explain why ? After merging dumpling and dumpling-backports wil= l be exactly the same. >=20 > Unless I hear otherwise, I will schedule suites to run on dumpling-back= ports first (as you are suggesting, with higher priority) and then assumi= ng that we resolved all issues, we will run on the dumpling merged.=20 >=20 > Sage, pls correct if this is not what has to be done. >=20 >=20 > Thx > YuriW >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Yuri Weinstein" > Cc: "Ceph Development" > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:05:31 AM > Subject: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE >=20 > Hi Yuri, >=20 > The dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 as found at https://github= =2Ecom/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports has been approved by Yehuda, = Josh and Sam and is ready for QE.=20 >=20 > For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3944c77= c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410 >=20 > I think it would be best for the QE tests to use the dumpling-backports= =2E The alternative would be to merge dumpling-backports into dumpling. H= owever, since testing may take a long time and require more patches, it p= robably is better to not do that iterative process on the dumpling branch= itself. As it is now, there already are a number of commits in the dumpl= ing branch that should really be in the dumpling-backports: they do not b= elong to v0.67.11 and are going to be released in v0.67.12. In the future= though, the dumpling branch will only receive commits that have been car= efully tested and all the integration work will be on the dumpling-backpo= rts branch exclusively. So that third parties do not have to worry that t= he dumpling branch contains commits that have not been tested yet. >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --Q9hpEAqFpvVRfreDtOdL3f3tcjxojUPoh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTaPnIACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22KagCgs029r4yyijjqbQo+psKnvXZM z1EAnR556BhvE16HTGkCVEzIXNpQtfz3 =n8wL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q9hpEAqFpvVRfreDtOdL3f3tcjxojUPoh--