Re: dprintk() and gdprintk() to be compiled out when NDEBUG

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>]

On 11/02/15 10:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 11.02.15 at 11:05, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 11/02/15 07:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose to honor the 'd' in these functions' names (which
>>> I understand to mean "debug") in that such functions should be
>>> no-ops in non-debug builds. I'd then be inclined to introduce a
>>> gprintk() automatically adding XENLOG_GUEST and the printing of
>>> current using the %pv format. Quite likely the (mis-)use of these
>>> two functions may then temporarily result in messages not meant
>>> to be debugging ones to become hidden in non-debug builds. If
>>> others agree, I'd try to make one pass through the tree to try to
>>> identify such, but I'd like to ask others to also keep an eye on that
>>> aspect.
>> I agree.  I suspect many of the existing gdprintk()s will need to turn
>> into dprintk()s.
> Maybe, but that's yet another topic (unless you meant gprintk()s
> instead of dprintk()s).

I did mean gprintk().  Sorry.

~Andrew